New research has been published regarding neonicotinoid seed treatments (NST). It has been revealed that this soybean treatment provides negligible benefit to U.S. farmers. In recent years the usage of NST has increased and it is estimated that approximately 50% of U.S. soybean planted acreage is treated with this class of insecticide seed treatment.
It appears that many soybean farmers have been using NST on their soybean seeds as a preventative measure, using it as insurance, or a just-in-case treatment. The latest research suggests that this is not a best management practice (BMP) and is unnecessary in many cases. It is recommended to only use NST on fields that have a specific pest history or have shown a direct positive regional impact to the crop.
Shawn P. Conley, professor and extension soybean specialist in the Department of Agronomy at the University of Wisconsin–Madison is project leader and has been a long-time proponent of soybean seed treatments in Wisconsin. He stated “I went into the project assuming this practice would have greater national effects; however, the data speaks for itself. There are many agronomic factors such as early planting, narrow row spacing, and seeding rate that farmers can implement that would play a greater role than neonicotinoids in maximizing economic yield.”
Dr. Christian Krupke, Professor of Entomology at Purdue University, and a contributor on this research shared additional insight. He stated that “Previously published studies have shown that the yield impacts of NST on crop productivity, including soybeans, were inconsistent at best. In our analysis of a large, 14-state dataset that represents the vast majority of soybean acreage in the United States, we show that benefits to yield are minor if any. Put another way, no significant insect pressure means no benefits from insecticides are possible.
Furthermore, the non-target impacts of the neonicotinoids used as seed treatments have been documented in dozens of studies by scientists all over the world. These impacts affect a wide range of organisms ranging from pollinators like honey bees to aquatic insects and the birds that depend on them for food. But even if we ignore that, farmers are simply wasting money on an approach that rarely pays for itself. When commodity prices are poor and the future looks murky, this is even more relevant, and our work highlights an input cost that most soybean farmers can readily do without.”
Stay up to date with the latest research at www.coolbean.info.
Read the full article here: Neonicotinoid Soybean Seed Treatments Provide Negligible Benefits to US Farmers
After a near ideal growing season, wet weather is causing nasty issues like the threat of moldy corn.
Given the quantity of rain we’ve received lately, be on the lookout for moldy corn. Mold can harm livestock and create problems in the food chain.
Buyers are on the lookout for mold. So if you suspect you have it, and you have crop insurance, contact your agent before you harvest. Your insurer will follow up and tell you how to proceed.
There’s tons to know about corn ear rot and you have Drs. Damon Smith and Paul Mitchell on your side to help fill you in. You can read their full post about this topic here.
In a nutshell, there are molds and there are really bad molds—ones that can produce toxins called mycotoxins that can threaten livestock who eat it. Grain buyers are actively on the hunt for mycotoxins to be certain anything they accept is below FDA action levels.
You can reduce mycotoxin risk. How? Check for moldy corn before you harvest as well as monitor the grain for mold. Just because mold is present does not mean mycotoxins are present—and, sadly, vice versa. If your alarm bells are ringing. collect smaples and have them tested at a reputable lab. Your corn agronomist or local UW Extension agent will be happy to work with you to collect samples properly and identify a trustworthy lab.
Here’s the main point. If your sample comes back high in mycotoxins—and we cannot stress this enough—do not blend that grain with uncontaminated corn.
So, what are you to do if you observe mold during harvest? Here are five concrete suggestions.
- Harvest and store the corn separately, as you might inadvertently contaminate loads of good corn
- Get out there and harvest ASAP. Letting corn stand into fall promotes Fusarium ear rot
- Avoid kernel damage as cracks in the kernels give fungi a purchase to grow
- Dry your corn properly as higher moisture creates a preferable environment for fungi growth. (For short term storage, aim for 15% moisture at a cool temperature of 55 degree Fahrenheit. For longer term storage, or storage in toastier months, aim for 13% moisture or less.
- Finally, keep your storage facilities clean. Mycotoxins are quite stable—freezing, drying and heating do not bother mycotoxins once they’re in your grain.
Want to know more about storing mycotoxin-affected grain? Read up on it here.
Finally, quality losses due to moldy corn are insurable losses if you’re insured—but you must follow the rules to secure your claim.
Protect yourself: the best practice is communicate with your crop insurance agent before harvesting any corn you suspect has mold issues. Some insurers prefer you leave unharvested rows in the field to allow crop loss adjustors to determine idemnities on the ground.
If you discover it along the way, let your agent know. Use that mobile phone—especially before you store or sell that grain. If you have a contaminated crop. your agent will tell you how to proceed. With mold and crop insurance, fast, accurate reporting wins the reimbursement.
With torrential rainfall comes the natural question of assessing flood damage in soybean fields.
Go here for timely, accurate management information developed by Shawn Conley and Grove Shannon.
The app calculates plant stand (population) by averaging five plant count samples taken randomly within a soybean field during the VC, V1 or V2 growth stage. The app then provides expected yield percent at harvest with or without replanting.
You simply snap five photos and the app does the rest.
The calculated values give growers the hard data needed to decide if replanting makes economic sense.
The app also provides the historical median frost date for the closest township within Wisconsin. So growers will know if a replanted crop should mature before the median frost date.
This way, growers can know if it’s worth the time, money and risk to replant before committing to that plan.
This powerful, easy-to-use app is the result of a joint effort between the University of Wisconsin College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (UW CALS) and the Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board (WSMB).
Click here to get the iPhone app.
Click here to get the app for Android devices.
As the fine article on the UW Extension website observes “Asian soybean rust is caused by the fungus Phakopsora pachyrhizi. The soybean rust pathogen has been moving progressively westward from its center of origin in China and has now reach North America. There is much speculation and apprehension on how soybean rust will develop and impact soybean production in the U.S.”
Asian Soybean Rust could have a serious impact on Wisconsin soybean crops. That’s why it’s essential to know the signs of the disease—especially since some symptoms of the blight are common to other infestations—and to keep a close eyes on your crop.
To help look for the disease, Wisconsin uses sentinel plots as an early warning system. This is part of a national sentinel plot monitoring effort made up of over 30 states. The sentinel plot network uses trained observers to look for signs and symptoms of rust. Most Wisconsin soybean growers will have a sentinel plot within their county or in a border county. These sentinel plots are monitored through a combined force of UW county extension agents, agriculture research station staff and UW-Madison campus research staff. You can see the sentinel plot observations for yourself here on the USDA Pest Information Platform for Extension and Education (PIPE) website.
Will this blight show up in Wisconsin? That’s the million dollar question and it depends on three key factors:
- Whether soybean rust occurs during early spring and summer in the Gulf coast region. This determines the amount of spores available to blow northward.
- Climate conditions in July—August. This determines whether conditions are favorable for rust to develop
- The northward movement of soybean rust carried by the weather and by “green bridging.”
(Unlike with Tospovirus, the soybean rust pathogen has not been shown to be transmitted by seed. So you needn’t be reluctant to purchased seed grown in areas where rust was found in the previous growing season).
While the sentinel plots are a great precautionary step, there is an active measure you can take as well and it doesn’t cost a dime: scout your crops.
As the UW Extension points out “Accurate and timely diagnosis of soybean rust is critical to achieve control of soybean rust, especially if fungicides are involved in the management plan. If national monitoring efforts indicate that rust spores are moving northward, soybean growers and crop advisors should plan to scout frequently for rust. Scout these areas first:
- Early-planted fields
- Early-maturing varieties
- Low-lying or protected fields with prolonged dew periods
- Fields with early canopy closure”
There’s a two-step process for scouting.
- Check the lower leaves from the main stem in the lower canopy first. These leaves are most likely to show symptoms first. Why? These leaves are likely to stay wetter longer, conditions the rust prefers. Use a 10-20X hand lands for viewing and do this on site to avoid spreading spores. Backlighting might help you see.
- Initial symptoms include small, gray spots, often on the underside of leaves or along the veins. You might also see them on petioles, stems and pods. These spots can grow and change in color from gray to tan, reddish brown or black. It’s vital to know that these symptoms are NOT exclusive to rust (You might be seeing brown spot blight or downy mildew. If you observe symptoms, you need to verify the cause. See Common Soybean Leaf Diseases and Asian Soybean Rust (pdf) for a good overview of look-alike diseases.
- If you see symptoms, look for signs (sporulation) of the virus pathogen. You know the gray/tan lesions you were looking for, they mature to to form pimple-like structures called pustules on the lower leaf surface. Active pustules contain the the powdery tan spores of the rust fungus.
- In the early stages, these pustules look like miniature volcanoes topped by with a pore, but there is no yellow halo around the pustule. In later stages these pustules burst and release spores to spread the disease. Use your 10-20x hand lens to spot the pustules. It is critical to observe sporulation in order to diagnose rust. This is the only definitive means for diagnosis.
- For an excellent printable online diagnostic guide of Asian Soybean Rust, look here.
Should it reach our state, Asian Soybean Rust can certainly negatively affect yields. So stay vigilant, scout your fields and ask questions if you see something that bothers you.
Wisconsin Farm Report journalist Pam Jahnke recently interviewed UW Extension Soybean Specialist Dr. Shawn Conley about possible effects of the upcoming state budget shortfall on UW Extension agents. (You can listen to the entire interview below.)
As it now stands, the budget shortfall for UW Extension Specialists is $1.7 million, or 18 percent of their budget. While Dr. Conley is working hard to do “more with less” he also notes that there will likely come a time where agents will have to do “less with less.”
Dr. Conley defines his job as conducting research and delivering its findings to farmers, crop consultants and technical service providers across the state. The goal is to help Wisconsin growers consistently put into the field the most “economically, environmentally and sustainable crops out there.” By doing so, farmers should both save money and improve their bottom line.
Dr. Conley thinks the shortfall will be felt most at the county level. Agents may need to expand to serving other counties. This means more time spent on the road, less frequent personal contact, and possibly missing events such as field days.
Dr. Conley adds that the Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board, funded through checkoff dollars, has been helpful in supporting his research and filling the gaps. Industry also supports his efforts but with the decline in crop prices, fewer resources are available.
One less obvious effect of the budget shortfall is the loss of technical expertise. After the former Extension Weed Specialist left for a job in industry, for example, the position went unfilled. That knowledge gap was felt last year when glyphosate resistant weeds affected soybean yields. As other Extension Specialists take new positions or retire, Dr.Conley is concerned other knowledge gaps will emerge that can hurt farmers.
Dr. Conley takes no political stand on these issues. Instead, he urges farmers to understand the current challenges and ask questions of whomever they feel is appropriate—such as UW Extension administration, county officials, legislators and the governor.
At the end of the day, Wisconsin looks to its farms and farmers to feed our state and a growing world. We all benefit from healthy, sustainable farms.
For the first time, a UW-Madison study has proven a crop-injuring Tospovirus can be passed from soybean seeds to plants, a finding with significant implications for soybean production around the world.
The landmark study shows the virus can spread from an infected seed lot to seedlings at a rate of 6%, which affects seed quality and reduces total oil content. Until now, Tospovirus transmission in this manner was unproven and thought unlikely.
Unchecked, the virus—called Soybean vein necrosis virus (SVNV)—could reduce the production of high quality, pathogen-free seed and soybean oil yields.
Armed with this new knowledge, soybean growers should work to preserve clean seed lots to help prevent SVNV damage in breeding nurseries and in the field. Further, UW-Madison Plant Pathologist Dr. Damon Smith urges seed producers to be diligent about scouting their crop and testing plants for SVNV so the virus is not transmitted to the next soybean generation.
Given the industry demand for high-oleic production, farmers should be aware that SVNV can reduce oil content in soybeans so it’s prudent to source soybean seeds from producers who use vigilant SVNV screening measures.
Dr. Smith points out there is no risk to animal or public health from Tospovirus, but reduced oil production can have a negative effect on farm profitability.
The study, released on January 19, 2016, has already sparked considerable interest around the world. Further research will be needed to understand why this particular virus can be seed transmitted. Smith suspects there may be multiple strains of the SVNV virus.
An abstract of this groundbreaking work follows below. Please go here to read the entire study—Groves et al., Seed Transmission of Soybean vein necrosis virus: The First Tospovirus Implicated in Seed Transmission, Web PLOS | ONE, 19 January 2016. <http://journals.plos.org>
This work was partially funded by the Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board in combination with funding from the USDA. Given the impact of this finding for U.S. soybean producers, this is a “must know” study with clear action steps that the growers and farmers should use from now on.
Abstract (From the Attached Downloadable PDF)
Soybean vein necrosis virus (SVNV; genus Tospovirus; Family Bunyaviridae) is a negativesense
single-stranded RNA virus that has been detected across the United States and in
Ontario, Canada. In 2013, a seed lot of a commercial soybean variety (Glycine max) with a
high percentage of discolored, deformed and undersized seed was obtained. A random
sample of this seed was planted in a growth room under standard conditions. Germination
was greater than 90% and the resulting seedlings looked normal. Four composite samples
of six plants each were tested by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
using published primers complimentary to the S genomic segment of SVNV. Two composite
leaflet samples retrieved from seedlings yielded amplicons with a size and sequence predictive
of SVNV. Additional testing of twelve arbitrarily selected individual plants resulted in
the identification of two SVNV positive plants. Experiments were repeated by growing seedlings
from the same seed lot in an isolated room inside a thrips-proof cage to further eliminate
any external source of infection. Also, increased care was taken to reduce any
possible PCR contamination. Three positive plants out of forty-eight were found using these
measures. Published and newly designed primers for the L and M RNAs of SVNV were also
used to test the extracted RNA and strengthen the diagnosis of viral infection. In experiments,
by three scientists, in two different labs all three genomic RNAs of SVNV were amplified
in these plant materials. RNA-seq analysis was also conducted using RNA extracted
from a composite seedling sample found to be SVNV-positive and a symptomatic sample
collected from the field. This analysis revealed both sense and anti-sense reads from all
three gene segments in both samples. We have shown that SVNV can be transmitted in
seed to seedlings from an infected seed lot at a rate of 6%. To our knowledge this is the first
report of seed-transmission of a Tospovirus
Carol Groves 1, Thomas German 2, Ranjit Dasgupta 2, Daren Mueller 3, Damon L. Smith 1*
1 Department of Plant Pathology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI, 53706, United
States of America, 2 Department of Entomology, University of Wisconsin, 1630 Linden Drive, Madison, WI,
53706, United States of America, 3 Department of Plant Pathology
Citation: Groves C, German T, Dasgupta R, Mueller
D, Smith DL (2016) Seed Transmission of Soybean
vein necrosis virus: The First Tospovirus Implicated in
Seed Transmission. PLoS ONE 11(1): e0147342.
Editor: Hanu R Pappu, Washington State University,
Received: June 26, 2015
Accepted: December 31, 2015
Published: January 19, 2016
Copyright: © 2016 Groves et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits
unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability Statement: All raw data files are available from the Dryad database at the following
Funding: Funding for this work was provided in part by the Wisconsin Soybean Marketing Board and the USDA-ARS Floriculture and Nursery Research Initiative. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Dr. Damon smith talks about white mold of soybean. For every 10% increase in incidence of white mold, there can be up to a 5 bushel per acre loss in yield. This makes white mold an important disease of soybean in the North Central soybean growing region. The discussion here includes how to identify white mold, details of the disease cycle, and how to manage the disease.
For more information about white mold visit the Soybean Plant Health Topics webpage at http://fyi.uwex.edu/fieldcroppatholog… and scroll down to the “White Mold” section.